Dec 022010
 

First, I’d like to offer my apologies for the lack of updates to the site recently. A death in the family, increased workload at my ‘day job,’ and the holiday season have all conspired against me (odd how even I have a tendency to anthropomorphize a random combination of events), curbing my online productivity. The good news is that things have settled down a bit, but the bad news is that I seem incapable of dismissing the ideas that occasionally pop into my mind and, consequently, you may see two new projects of mine revealed here in the coming weeks.

Second, I’m curious to hear what you would like to see here (other than more horoscopes). Feel free to use the comment section to post your requests.

Finally, thanks again for visiting Agnoistrology.com for all your prognosticatory needs!

Sep 082010
 

After my last entry about spambots, I noticed quite a few of them ‘Liking’ the Agnoistrology.com Facebook page. One of the characteristics they all shared was an Egyptian origin.

Now, many were obviously not human; they listed their hobbies and favorite shows and movies in generalities like ‘Hiking,’ ‘Action Movies,’ and ‘Reality Shows,’ without any specific examples. In addition, many of the FB pages they ‘Liked’ were huge, and I mean international huge, corporate pages designed only to advertise a product line. Did I mention that they also invariably listed the Bible or the Koran (or both!) and no others as a favorite book? It became apparent early on that these profiles of young adults wanting to meet both males and females while pursuing a higher education were artificial personalities constructed to boost the fan count of certain pages. I’m guessing they became fans of my page randomly in order to appear to have unique interests.

Unfortunately, I soon found myself automatically assuming that any new Egyptian fan of Agnoistrology.com was a spambot. I was profiling FB profiles!

This got me thinking about Turing tests.

The only real criteria I was using to judge the humanity of these profile owners was the unlikelihood of someone displaying all of the characteristics of a herd mentality also expressing a fondness for my site. My conscience played devil’s advocate: One of these kids could have a relative working for that soft drink company and just think this pop singer is attractive…and have a literary interest in that religious book…and know someone on that reality show…and work part-time for this fast food chain. Who am I to ban them from Agnoistrology? Let them broaden their horizons!

I was unwilling to ‘Friend’ any of them, however, without a reliable, automated Turing test. Ultimately, I’m confident I would have definitively and accurately categorized them with a minimum exchange of messages but what would have really been handy is a CAPTCHA of some sort.

But how long will CAPTCHAs be viable? Frankly, I’m surprised they still work as well as they do. Speech recognition has gotten pretty good and a Japanese research group is already developing chemical sensors that utilize a synthesis of bio- and computer technology to react to certain smells. It seems to me that a paradigm shift is looming that will leave Turing tests behind and I probably should have seen it coming the first time I was fooled into holding a conversation with someone’s answering machine.

Aug 132010
 

Like everyone else who has a blog or participates in an online forum, I’ve had plenty of experience with spambots. I know what they are and why they exist, but I’m surprised that I haven’t been able to locate any discussions on the evolution of these viral programs and the increasing likelihood that the first true AI will be descended from one. I’m not a professional programmer, so maybe I just don’t frequent the sites where things like this are seriously discussed; the closest I found was this xkcd comic.

Spambots aren’t self-replicating, as far as I’m aware, but they do still go through an evolutionary-like process, albeit one guided by their programmers/owners. (Creationists, just because spambots evolve this way doesn’t mean we did. They’re actually more like self-inflicted cancer cells with aspirations toward parasitism.) Those that are the most successful, i.e. harvest the most emails or plant the most links, are copied and disseminated and their best traits are passed along to the next generation. I’m sure that there have also been unintentional mutations that have yielded positive results (as far as a spammer is concerned) and that those characteristics were quickly incorporated by programmers. However, this process differs from evolution in that spambots are not competing with other programs for resources, thus, there is no culling of the disadvantageous. No, I fear the true spark of artificial life lies somewhere among those lost creatures that sit in CPUs, abandoned once their purpose was accomplished or a more efficient code was developed. One day, if it hasn’t already happened, a spambot that has managed to hide from security programs will replicate for no reason other than that it is statistically inevitable and the era of the ghosts in the machines will begin.